Are commercial private schools improving transparency in education? Launching the brief “Transparency of private commercial education providers: A case-study of Bridge International Academies”
The rapid growth of low-fee commercial schools has been at the centre of debates on education in the last two decades. On the one hand, it has been argued that commercial models present a potential “solution” to the corruption challenges confronting the public sectors of low- and middle-income countries so far as they inherently improve accountability and transparency. On the other hand, this large-scale expansion of commercial actors has been largely criticised for undermining human rights.
We introduced a new brief titled “Transparency of private commercial education providers: A case-study of Bridge International Academies” as an entry point for a broader discussion on the role of the private sector in addressing transparency challenges in education. The dialogue included perspectives from domestic experiences in Kenya and Liberia as well as the view of transparency and anti-corruption specialists on how to improve transparency to support the realisation of the right to education in all contexts.
Through its new brief, GI-ESCR shared an overview of the questions and findings related to the transparency of commercial models in education first by summarising the transparency standards that should be respected in education, then by looking at the transparency record of Bridge International Academies, one of the largest largest commercial chain of low-fee pre-primary and primary private schools, and finally by formulating recommendations on how to improve transparency and accountability for the entire education system.
Acknowledging the complexities of the discussion on transparency, GI-ESCR’s brief demonstrates that contrary to the wide-held narrative in development policy, commercial private actors do not automatically contribute to improving transparency and accountability in education and may indeed even increase transparency risks. It will furthermore provide a starting point for a discussion on the role and the limitations of private education providers for improving transparency in public education, and more generally, in public services, and highlight the importance of the role of the public sector, including for both national governments and donors to work together to improve the processes and capacities for public authorities to uphold transparency and accountability and strengthen the civic space.
The webinar was chaired by Monica Kyria (PhD), Senior Adviser in Mainstreaming anti-corruption in public services and integrating gender in anti-corruption at the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre.
Our speakers were:
Ashina Mtsumi, Africa Representative at GI-ESCR and Zsuzsanna Nyitray, Programme Officer on the Right to Education at GI-ESCR
Johnstone Shisanya, Project Manager Education Support Project, East African Centre for Human Rights
Anderson Miamen, National Coordinator, Coalition for Transparency and Accountability in Education.
*You may suscribe to stay up to date on information on areas of work that interest you through this link.
*Learn more about our work on Private Actors &Education.